I'd love to see your comment framed somewhere that all this sub and r/eu4 (and r/hoi4, and r/stellaris, etc) could see.All the talk about how paradox is making the game worse, and how the DLCs are overpriced, and how they make the game unplayable, and how "I'm gonna stick with 1.11, the last good version of the game", and all that bullshit is so exhausting, and and so frequent!
The title pretty much says it all. I've become a bit of a paradox vet over the last few years with Cities, Stellaris, Imperator Rome, CK3, and Vic3 but have yet to dip my toes into EU4, mainly in indecision over which dlc to get and is it worth without them or can I just keep digging into the other time period grand strategies.
Depends on what you enjoy about grand strategy games. If you like nation building and conquest, then EU4 is a perfect match. I guess you'll just have to try it, I can't definitely say If a game that in it's entirety costs hundreds of dollars is going to be worth it for you. The_Kaiser249. • 2 yr. ago.
Yup. I paid like 40€ for base game, and all DLC, and that's expensive, because I didn't want to wait for a bundle with last 3 DLCs, so I paid like 8€ each for the newest ones, and 15 for bundle with everything before emperor. I don't get people who complain this game is expensive.
However, the DLC is all priced ridiculously, and isn't worth it unless it's on, like, 75% sale. DLC culture is terrible. I won't be buying any more paradox games until they get their ♥♥♥♥ together. Witohut DLC the game is a half baked beta.